Crypto Mortgages in the US Tackle Valuation Risks and Regulatory Challenges

By: crypto insight|2026/01/22 19:00:01
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The adoption of crypto mortgages is facing challenges around valuation risks and regulatory uncertainties in the U.S.
  • The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop plans recognizing cryptocurrency in loan applications.
  • Crypto mortgages could potentially aid young investors in achieving homeownership but come with significant hurdles.
  • Political influences and market risks are crucial factors impacting the future success and implementation of crypto mortgages.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-01-22 07:35:36

The landscape of home financing in America is witnessing a groundbreaking shift, as some lenders are gradually acknowledging cryptocurrency holdings like Bitcoin while considering mortgage applications. This move, however, is shadowed by significant risks and regulatory vagueness, presenting a double-edged sword for involved parties. This article delves into this evolving domain, detailing the impacts, challenges, and implications for the future.

Progressive Steps Towards Crypto Recognition

On a pivotal day, January 16, Newrez, a leading lender based in Pennsylvania, announced its plans to incorporate certain cryptocurrency holdings into their mortgage application evaluations beginning February. This change will impact loans for various purposes, including home purchases, refinancing endeavors, and other investment ventures. Newrez’s initiative follows the prompting directions laid out last year by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). By June 2025, the FHFA instructed Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) to devise strategies recognizing crypto as part of loan applications.

These directives have granted cryptocurrency partial acknowledgment from two significant governmental entities instrumental in supplying liquidity and stability to the mortgage industry. This recognition sparked excitement, with notable personalities like Michael Saylor, chair of the Bitcoin treasury company Strategy, labeling it a defining moment for Bitcoin’s integration into the “American dream.” However, despite supportive signals from housing authorities and burgeoning acceptance, issuers remain cautious, and regulatory clarity is far from robust.

A New Avenue for Young Americans

One driving force behind FHFA’s encouragement was the intention to broaden the scope of “the American dream,” primarily signifying homeownership. In an official communication to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA’s director Bill Pulte emphasized considering crypto’s inclusion as part of the companies’ aspirations to “help ensure sustainable, long-term home ownership.”

Historically, homeownership rates in the U.S. have hovered between 60% and 70%, maintaining relative stability over the last six decades. However, recent years have witnessed a sharp ascent in homeowners’ average age. In 2010, the average homeowner’s age was approximately 39 years old, which nearly doubled to 59 years old by 2025. This trend indicates a diminishing presence of younger entrants from Millennial and Gen Z generations within the real estate market.

The consolidation of single-family homes into lesser hands has been exacerbated by major institutional investors’ penetration into the housing market. A report from 2023 by the Hamilton Project highlighted that mega-investors owned significant portions of single-family home rental stock—27% in Atlanta and as much as 45% in Memphis.

Given that a considerable majority of crypto holders are under 44, facilitating the inclusion of their crypto holdings in mortgage assessments could provide a gateway for these younger investors to access homeownership, sparking a potential ripple effect across the market landscape.

Challenges of Crypto Mortgage Implementation

While the prospect of crypto mortgages holds potential for catalyzing positive changes within homeownership, it remains fraught with challenges. Milo, a fintech company based in Miami, had previously made strides in this area by announcing the possibility of borrowers leveraging their crypto assets to secure 30-year mortgages, all while maintaining asset ownership. Josip Rupena, Milo’s CEO and founder, previously remarked that traditional home credit pathways for crypto consumers inadvertently led to unwanted tax liabilities from selling assets for down payments.

Despite Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s endeavors, uncertainties persist, most notably concerning crypto’s volatility. This volatility presents a substantial risk for lenders, prompting potential downward adjustments (a “haircut”) on crypto valuations to safeguard against price declines. Moreover, the cryptocurrency assets must be held on U.S.-regulated exchanges, adding another layer of complexity.

Political Underpinnings of Crypto Mortgages

Beyond the financial and logistical hurdles, a political dimension heavily influences the trajectory of crypto mortgages. Bill Pulte indicated that his June directive aligned with President Trump’s vision of establishing the United States as a leading crypto hub. According to Daryl Fairweather, Redfin’s chief economist, this stance aids in normalizing and legitimizing cryptocurrencies domestically, serving may align with presidential agendas more than it contributes substantially to financial reform.

Notably, the move faced pushback from prominent Democrats, including Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, who criticized the prioritization of political motives over concerns regarding financial market stability. They highlighted potential conflicts regarding Pulte’s dual role as FHFA director and the chair of the Enterprises’ boards in approving proposals aimed at incorporating crypto assets into the mortgage ecosystem.

Simultaneously, Republican lawmakers have sought to codify the directive into law, with Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis introducing the 21st Century Mortgage Act in July 2025. Despite its introduction, the bill remains stagnant, lodged within the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Challenges to the political momentum backing crypto mortgages remain, with market risks posing significant hesitations for prominent lenders to endorse the bill. The gap between considering crypto for a loan and converting it into dollars adds to the skepticism shrouding this legislation’s efficacy.

Shaping the Future of Crypto Mortgages

While lenders assess the broader implications of these directives for their operational frameworks, the Trump administration has concurrently been exploring alternative strategies for lowering housing costs. Proposals include leveraging Americans’ retirement savings, such as 401(k) plans, as down payment options. Additionally, Trump himself has proposed barring substantial institutional investors from acquiring single-family homes, potentially reshaping real estate market dynamics.

With an overwhelming political push in Washington policies supporting cryptocurrencies—from stablecoins to encompassing crypto mortgages— their significant momentum could influence housing affordability. Still, this momentum hinges upon lending institutions deeming it a sound business model.

The evolving realm of crypto mortgages exists at the intersection of technological innovation and entrenched economic norms. While the recognition of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies within the U.S. housing finance system marks significant progress, it simultaneously unveils a host of issues necessitating thoughtful resolution. As conversations around regulatory protocols, asset valuation, and political intentions continue, the path forward for crypto mortgages will undoubtedly be closely watched and hotly debated.

FAQs

What are the main risks associated with crypto mortgages?

Crypto mortgages face significant valuation risks due to the volatile nature of cryptocurrencies. Lenders may apply a ‘haircut’ to cushion against potential price declines, and regulatory uncertainty also adds complexity to the adoption of such financial instruments.

How do crypto mortgages benefit younger generations?

Crypto mortgages could make homeownership more accessible for younger generations, many of whom own cryptocurrency assets. By recognizing these assets in mortgage applications, it could help alleviate some financial barriers faced by Millennials and Gen Z.

What role do politics play in the future of crypto mortgages?

Politics significantly impact the viability of crypto mortgages. The support of these initiatives aligns with certain political agendas, promoting the U.S. as a crypto-friendly environment, though it faces pushback due to financial risk concerns.

How does the valuation ‘haircut’ affect crypto mortgage applicants?

A valuation ‘haircut’ reduces the collateral value of cryptocurrencies used in mortgage applications, reflecting anticipated market fluctuations. This adjustment ensures lenders mitigate risks associated with crypto’s inherent price volatility.

Why are major lenders hesitant to embrace crypto mortgages?

Major lenders may hesitate due to the market risk involved in evaluating crypto assets and the conversion process into fiat currencies. Regulatory uncertainties and political controversy further complicate lenders’ acceptance of crypto as a reliable mortgage backing.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more