ETHGas Airdrop Eligibility Scrubbing, WLFI Proposal Sparks Controversy, What's Today's Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About?

By: blockbeats|2026/01/21 18:00:01
0
Share
copy
Publication Date: January 21, 2025
Author: BlockBeats Editorial Team

Over the past 24 hours, the discussion in the crypto market has shifted from a macro narrative to specific ecosystem events, with a high concentration of attention and clear divergence. The mainstream topics have focused on the airdrop and DeFi governance upgrade-driven participation boom, while WLFI governance controversy and the Trove rug-pull have heightened market vigilance towards transparency and fund security. In terms of ecosystem development, Ethereum has strengthened its institutional narrative and stablecoin innovation, the Perp DEX race has intensified competition around incentive mechanisms and fee optimization, and the battle for on-chain liquidity has further heated up.

1. Mainstream Topics

1. ETHGas Airdrop Release

The ETHGas Foundation has officially launched the $GWEI token airdrop eligibility check tool, allowing users to verify their eligibility by connecting their wallets. The airdrop eligibility is mainly based on historical Ethereum mainnet gas consumption (at least 0.5 ETH), community participation behavior (such as sharing Gas ID or forwarding announcements), Discord/Telegram activity, and at least 500 Beans points, among other indicators. The foundation has announced that the airdrop snapshot has been completed, and the claiming will commence at 13:00 UTC on January 21, aimed at rewarding Ethereum ecosystem contributors and initiating the governance process. The foundation emphasizes that this will be the "real-time Ethereum economy" starting point, with more seasonal activities to follow.

Community engagement is high, with many users eagerly sharing their eligibility results, some celebrating their qualification, while others have reported issues with the checker tool or missing eligibility due to a failure to bind their Gas ID promptly. Discussions regarding the allocation size and TGE expectations continue to ferment, with some believing that the project may drive the development of real-time Ethereum infrastructure. However, users are also reminded to be cautious of phishing links and scam risks. The overall sentiment is mostly optimistic, and it is regarded as one of the focal points of the airdrop season.

2. Pendle Launches sPENDLE

Pendle has introduced sPENDLE as a new governance and staking token, replacing the existing vePENDLE vesting system. This upgrade introduces a more flexible withdrawal mechanism (14-day unlock or instant withdrawal with a 5% fee) and supports deep staking integration to enhance DeFi composability. Pendle has stated that up to 80% of protocol revenue will be used for $PENDLE buybacks and distributed to sPENDLE holders, while the token emission is expected to decrease by 20%–30%. The vePENDLE locks will be suspended on January 29, in coordination with a migration snapshot to complete the transition. The current average TVL of Pendle is around $57 billion, and this adjustment is seen as a key move to address the pain point of "inefficient capital locking."

The community widely acknowledges this upgrade, seeing it as effectively addressing the issue of low veToken model adoption and making $PENDLE more aligned with institutional holding logic. The discussion primarily revolves around income distribution details (e.g., the yield split for virtual sPENDLE) and the potential impact of the upgrade on price. Some users are optimistic about its role in incentivizing long-term holding while also cautioning against short-term volatility. The overall feedback is mostly positive, seen as a significant milestone for Pendle toward a mature protocol governance system.

3. Mask Network Takes Over Lens

Mask Network has taken over the custody of the Lens protocol, with the original team (led by Aave founder Stani) transitioning to technical advisors and refocusing on DeFi. Mask plans to integrate products like Orb and Firefly to drive user-centric app development, strengthening creator economies and community growth. The Lens team emphasizes that the infrastructure will remain open-source and neutral, aiming to propel decentralized social interactions towards broader mainstream adoption.

The community overall holds an optimistic view of this change, with many users appreciating the foundational contributions of the original team and looking forward to Mask's capabilities in privacy and SocialFi. Discussions primarily focus on the ecosystem integration effects (e.g., interoperability among different clients) and sustainable monetization models in the long term. While some express concerns about potential further fragmentation of user and app ecosystems, the general sentiment is that this transition may inject new growth momentum into Lens and accelerate the productization of DeSoc.

4. Zama Token ICO Launch Imminent

Zama's $ZAMA token public sale is set to launch on January 21 at 8:00 UTC using a sealed-bid Dutch auction mechanism, with the supply accounting for 8% of the total tokens. The auction channels include the Zama app, CoinList, and KuCoin, with a floor price of $0.005 per token (approximately $55 million FDV), supporting USDT bids and offering a 10% bonus for OG NFT holders. Zama, with fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) at its core, focuses on on-chain privacy computation, having raised approximately $138 million.

The community is engaged in passionate discussions about bidding strategies and valuation expectations, with some believing the final clearing valuation may land in the $3–4 billion FDV range, drawing parallels to Gensyn's valuation path. Simultaneously, concerns about wallet security (such as Bron Wallet), reward mechanisms, and the impact of the presale on the secondary market are also gaining traction. Overall, the market generally views Zama as a significant representative of the privacy narrative, expecting its "seamless on-chain privacy computation" to enhance DeFi usability.

5. WLFI Stablecoin Proposal Sparks Controversy

The World Liberty Financial (WLFI) USD1 stablecoin expansion proposal passed through governance voting, approving the use of 5% of the treasury funds (around $120 million) to drive USD1 expansion. However, voting data shows that the top 9 wallets (presumed to be the team and partners) control nearly 60% of the voting power. The proposal had initially failed, but was later "forced through" amidst controversy, leading to community suspicions. According to the WLFI whitepaper, 75% of the protocol revenue goes to the Trump family, and 25% goes to the Witkoff family, with token holders having no profit-sharing rights. Additionally, investor tokens remain locked and cannot be voted to unlock.

The community has strongly pushed back, viewing this as a typical case of "pseudo-governance" and value extraction structure. Further analyses by Bubble Maps and others have reinforced the accusations of team-controlled governance manipulation. Users are calling for the project to be "shamefully exposed," predicting a continued weakening of its long-term value (currently around $17 billion FDV). Some traders have taken short positions, seeing it as a cautionary tale of governance failure and highlighting systemic risks in the "trustee model."

6. Trove Incident Reveals More Information, Reigniting ICO Risks

Trove has been accused of being an ICO scam: the project raised around $11.5 million, canceled the Hyperliquid integration plan post-TGE, shifted to Solana, and withdrew funds. The token plummeted by 95% post-TGE, with the FDV dropping from around $20 million to $1.4 million. On-chain tracking revealed that team wallet funds flowed to a casino and betting platform, and no refunds were made, sparking collective community outrage.

Discussion around the incident is predominantly angry, with users sharing losses and blaming some KOLs for not fully disclosing advertising partnerships. The controversy has also expanded to pre-sale risks, information asymmetry, and market manipulation. Many see this as a representative "rug pull example" since the beginning of 2026, and are calling for more transparent issuance and fundraising platforms, such as Legion.

II. Mainstream Ecosystem Updates

1. Ethereum

TokenRelations has released the "Institutional Ethereum Update" report to address institutional investors' need for coverage of the Ethereum ecosystem. This report provides macro and ecosystem insights to institutions and retail investors on a daily basis, emphasizing Ethereum's long-term value and institutional adoption trends.

The overall community response has been positive, with many users acknowledging the necessity of this kind of "institutional perspective content," and some even suggesting expanding similar updates to other chains like Solana. Throughout the discussion, Ethereum's security and decentralization advantages have been repeatedly mentioned and seen as its long-term moat.

Meanwhile, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated in a Bloomberg live stream that cryptocurrencies will open wealth generation opportunities for 4 billion people and that "issuing stablecoins" could ultimately reshape the traditional banking business model, driving real ownership, sustainable use cases, and a higher level of economic freedom. He also emphasized the potential of tokenized assets and mentioned Coinbase's role at the infrastructure layer.

Armstrong's remarks sparked widespread discussion. The community broadly agrees with the direction of stablecoins and asset tokenization but also stresses the need for more than just narrative, requiring more "on-the-ground evidence" such as larger-scale infrastructure advancements and sustainable scenario validations. Some opinions criticize the current lack of commitments, calling for solutions to real-world obstacles such as volatility, compliance pathways, and institutional adoption thresholds. The overall sentiment remains largely positive, with more people seeing it as a signal of Ethereum's move towards institutional-grade maturity, but also maintaining caution regarding the practical challenges of TradFi integration.

2.Perp DEX

The competition in the Perp DEX space continues to revolve around "incentive mechanisms and fee optimization." Nado introduced "The Choice" mechanism during the Private Alpha phase, where users must choose one of three reward schemes: points (8 million points for $INK rewards), fee rebate ($4 million), or NFTs (1000 available, limited to the first 30% of users). The deadline is January 26, and those who do not choose will default to receiving points. The Open Beta will launch on January 30, with ongoing tracking of activity data.

This mechanism has received much praise, with users believing that the choice increases the fairness of incentives and sense of participation. Discussions mainly focus on the strategic trade-offs between "points vs. NFTs," while also reminding the need for a careful evaluation of the actual benefits of different options.

Additionally, Blockworks interviewed Lighter's founder, Vladimir, discussing the progress of their collaboration with Robinhood, the differentiated path from Hyperliquid (emphasizing Ethereum L2's composability and trust model), equity versus token value accrual mechanisms, and the team's long-term alignment strategy. The interview has generally received positive feedback from the community, recognizing the narrative of "Ethereum-first + alignment design," but some have raised concerns about the ecosystem isolation risk outside of Ethereum L1 and latency issues in high-frequency trading scenarios.

Meanwhile, Markets has updated its funding rate mechanism to reduce holding costs and enhance the trading experience; HyENA has been opened up for external use, with trading fees reduced by around 50% and a 12% boosted APR available for both long and short positions. Users with a trading volume of over $5000 in the past week can also receive a 1.15x points bonus. Overall, these actions are all pointing towards the same goal: to attract more traders back to on-chain by reducing fees, improving privacy, and enhancing liquidity efficiency.

The community has responded positively to the fee optimization of Markets and HyENA, with users sharing their trading experiences and "points maximizing" strategies, while also emphasizing the importance of leverage risks and market volatility. The overall sentiment is optimistic, but there is still a focus on team transparency and long-term sustainability.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more