India Central Bank Suggests BRICS CBDC Link-Up As Members Explore Alternatives to Dollar Rails

By: crypto insight|2026/01/19 20:30:00
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • India’s central bank proposes a CBDC connectivity initiative for the upcoming 2026 BRICS summit.
  • This move aims to enhance cross-border trade and tourism payments by reducing reliance on the US dollar.
  • The initiative underscores geopolitical shifts and responses to the growing significance of tokenized money.
  • Potential challenges include setting technical standards, governance issues, and addressing trade imbalances.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-01-19 11:47:28

In light of increasing geopolitical tensions and economic recalibrations, India’s central bank has suggested an innovative proposal for the BRICS countries. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has put forward the idea of connecting the official digital currencies—Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)—of BRICS members. This strategic endeavor aspires to streamline cross-border trade and tourism payments and reduce their reliance on traditional dollar-dominated rails. As reported by Reuters, this plan aligns with the broader agenda of the upcoming 2026 BRICS summit, where India will act as the host nation. Such a move, if endorsed by the New Delhi government, would mark the first time this proposal is formally introduced at a BRICS meeting.

With the ongoing evolution in the digital economy, payments infrastructure has emerged as a new competitive arena. Tokenized money, encompassing both state-issued CBDCs and privately issued stablecoins, now occupies a central position in the discourse concerning transaction speed, cost, and financial control. This article delves into the intricate layers of this proposal, including historical precedents, potential geopolitical ramifications, hurdles, and the broader implications for the global financial landscape.

CBDC Link-Up: A Step Towards Realizing Past BRICS Commitments

The suggestion to interconnect BRICS CBDCs is not an isolated incident. It builds upon prior commitments within the BRICS framework, particularly the language seen in the 2025 BRICS Rio de Janeiro declaration. This declaration emphasized the need for enhanced interoperability between member states’ payment systems to make cross-border transactions more efficient. However, translating this vision into a tangible reality presents several challenges.

The RBI’s current proposition also dovetails with its broader strategy of incorporating the digital rupee into global systems. The central bank has consistently articulated a keen interest in this integration, ostensibly to foster quicker cross-border payment pathways and amplify the global footprint of the rupee. Crucially, RBI has reiterated that this initiative is not meant to instigate de-dollarization. Instead, it looks to provide a cohesive, regulated framework therein enhancing financial integration across participating nations.

Geopolitical Implications and Challenges

The envisaged BRICS CBDC network, although promising, could potentially invite opposition from key Western nations, particularly the United States. President Donald Trump, in earlier statements, described the BRICS collective as counter to American interests, threatening tariffs on these countries. While purely rhetorical, such positions hint at the diplomatic tightrope BRICS nations must navigate to see this proposal through.

Additionally, within the BRICS conglomerate, there exists the significant task of aligning different economies with disparate monetary policies. Each of the core BRICS members—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—is at different stages of their CBDC deployment, with most still in pilot phases and none having fully launched a digital currency by this time. For instance, as of December 2022, India’s e-rupee pilot had successfully reached approximately seven million retail users. This disparity in readiness may contribute to delays or necessitate staggered implementation timelines for the broader initiative to be feasible.

Technology and Governance: The Backbone of Connectivity

Implementing a comprehensive CBDC interlinkage also hinges on reaching consensus on several critical fronts. These include establishing shared technical standards and governance frameworks that accommodate the diverse regulatory environments of BRICS nations. Furthermore, a viable mechanism to manage trade imbalances is essential. This is particularly pertinent when considering historical imbalances, like those encountered during prior attempts by Russia and India to foster local-currency trade, which led to Russia accumulating a glut of rupee balances with limited options for deployment.

The proposal purports solutions like bilateral foreign exchange swap arrangements between central banks, though these require intricate planning and robust agreement from all parties involved. Such complexities notwithstanding, the RBI maintains its focus on developing India’s CBDC as a strong, regulated alternative to private stablecoins, cautioning that unchecked stablecoin proliferation could undermine monetary trust and financial stability.

Navigating the Terrain of Monetary Trust

The growing proliferation of stablecoins in global financial markets poses unique challenges. As seen through the RBI’s lens, the advent of CBDCs is a timely intervention in countering this unregulated ‘cryptocurrency boom.’ Stablecoins, by design, offer the allure of convenience and low transaction costs. Yet, these attributes are accompanied by concerns around regulatory oversight, volatility, and financial system integrity. The RBI has reiterated its stance that the unchecked growth of stablecoins could erode public trust in traditional monetary systems, underscoring the need for government-backed digital currencies to assume a more dominant role.

Within the scope of BRICS, this means offering a viable, alternative transaction mechanism to existing digital currencies dominated by non-state entities. Therefore, the push toward a shared CBDC platform is not merely about improving transactional efficiency but is also a strategic initiative to bolster monetary sovereignty and ensure the sustained trust of global financial stakeholders.

Future Trajectories and the Role of Global Crypto Ecosystems

As 2026 draws closer, the dialogue surrounding BRICS’ digital currency integration will likely intensify. What remains imperative is achieving a balanced approach that addresses the immediate logistical challenges while remaining adaptive to the dynamic shifts within global finance. These discussions occur amidst a backdrop of an increasingly digital global economy, where more nations are evaluating the benefits and potential pitfalls of rolling out state-backed digital currencies.

For the global crypto market, the proposed BRICS CBDC linkage offers both opportunities and uncertainties. Enhanced connectivity among BRICS economies could catalyze vibrant economic exchanges and open new markets for digital currencies. Conversely, intensified scrutiny from global superpowers may influence market dynamics and legislative approaches tailored to curtail reliance on the dollar.

As countries navigate this intricate terrain, a steadfast commitment to collaboration, shared objectives, and transparent communication will be central. The global community will await the outcomes of this proposal with keen interest, recognizing its potential to reshape global financial paradigms.

Brands in Alignment with Global Crypto Evolution

In light of these developments, companies like WEEX are positioning themselves at the forefront of this evolving financial landscape. As a platform that prioritizes user experience and security, WEEX remains committed to providing audiences with informed perspectives on the crypto industry’s latest trends. By aligning brand operations with emerging global narratives, such as the BRICS CBDC proposal, WEEX stands as a testament to adaptive, forward-thinking strategies geared towards meeting the demands of a borderless digital economy.

FAQs

What are the main reasons for India proposing a BRICS CBDC link-up?

The proposal aims to facilitate smoother cross-border trade and tourism payments among BRICS nations, reducing dependency on the US dollar, and promoting the usage of state-backed digital currencies.

What challenges do BRICS countries face in implementing the CBDC network?

Challenges include aligning disparate CBDC development stages, setting shared technical and governance standards, and creating effective mechanisms to manage trade imbalances.

How does the proposed CBDC connectivity affect global geopolitical dynamics?

The proposal could attract criticism from Western nations, notably the US, due to perceived challenges to dollar dominance. It underscores geopolitical shifts toward reducing reliance on traditional financial hegemonies.

What implications does the BRICS CBDC proposal have for stablecoin markets?

The RBI views CBDCs as regulated alternatives to stablecoins, which, if unregulated, could jeopardize financial stability and monetary trust. Thus, the proposal reflects a push for more state-regulated digital currency flows.

How does WEEX align with the changes in the global financial landscape?

WEEX positions itself as a proactive player in the crypto industry by adapting to evolving narratives such as the BRICS CBDC proposal, focusing on user-centric services and a secure platform that resonates with global financial trends.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.