Is the Aave-to-Solana move worth debating?

By: blockbeats|2025/02/11 17:45:02
0
Share
copy

Yesterday, Virtuals Protocol announced that the VIRTUAL token is now tradable on the Solana blockchain, with its official LP now live on Meteora and preparations underway for Virtual Protocol's Launchpad on Solana. Meanwhile, Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik tweeted about when Aave would be available on Solana, mentioning Aave team members and Solana's founder.

Is the Aave-to-Solana move worth debating?

However, the replies to this tweet turned into a debate between Solana supporters and Aave fans, reflecting a broader market share battle between the Ethereum and Solana ecosystems in specific application areas.

A "War of Words" on Lending Protocols

Solana bull and Multicoin partner Kyle Samani commented under this tweet mentioning Kamino, a DeFi lending protocol in the Solana ecosystem, suggesting that Kamino is Solana's version of Aave.

Svanevik responded, stating that Aave is ten times larger than Kamino and that "if Aave users could seamlessly switch chains, it would unleash a significant TVL."

However, Solana's founder toly and Foundation Chair Lily Liu disagree. Lily mentioned that Kamino's product is superior, proudly stating, "Today's metrics don't represent tomorrow's performance." toly supported a native team focused on the Solana mainnet, suggesting that backing a team that concentrates on Solana long-term is wiser than supporting a multi-chain team with divided attention, effectively dismissing the possibility of Aave on Solana.

Amidst the sharp criticisms from the Solana community, supporters of Aave and the Ethereum ecosystem were not to be outdone.

Aave founder Stani directly criticized Solana DeFi, stating that it copied Aave's outdated technology, pasted a semi-finished UI, and restricted UK users. While Stani referred to Solana DeFi, it was clear to observers that he was targeting Kamino, another lending protocol.

Subsequently, toly shared the DeFiLlama interface of Aave and Kamino, stating that Kamino's TVL is 1/8 of Aave's, but its revenue is only 1/2.5 of Aave's. "I don't understand why Aave would be a better product if no revenue can be squeezed out of it; TVL is just a cost."

Stani also sharply replied that Kamino's USDC reserve factor (i.e., the percentage the platform extracts from each transaction or pool) is 15%, while Aave's is only 10%, meaning it charges higher fees extracted from user pools. Stani believes this shows the current lack of competitiveness in the Solana ecosystem, resulting in weak bargaining power for users when choosing a DeFi platform, leading to higher fees that are ultimately borne by users.

The instigator of this "war of words," Alex Svanevik, then added fuel to the fire, suggesting that Solana has surpassed Ethereum in several key metrics, including active addresses, transaction volume, DEX trading volume, and total gas fee revenue. However, in terms of TVL, Solana has yet to surpass Ethereum. In light of this, the most direct strategy is to attract Aave, the top-ranked app by TVL on Ethereum, to deploy on Solana, further enhancing its competitiveness in the DeFi ecosystem.

Some in the comments section questioned the rationale behind this, as deploying Aave on Solana would not magically create TVL. Svanevik explained that for Aave's deployment to have absolutely no impact on Solana's TVL growth, two conditions must be met simultaneously:

1. Aave's current TVL has no funds migrating to Solana;

2. There is no additional TVL entering Aave on Solana.

However, as Aave has already attracted $200 billion in TVL, Svanevik believes Aave should migrate to Solana, leaving people momentarily unable to determine whether Svanevik is an Ethereum maxi or a Solana maxi.

Trust Cost Above All

Undoubtedly, Aave is a core DeFi application in the Ethereum ecosystem, alongside Uniswap, Lido, and others, forming the core landscape of Ethereum DeFi. However, some in the community question why Ethereum's top DeFi applications would overlook an ecosystem like Solana with unlimited potential. Putting aside code and other technical factors, the reasons why an application chooses not to migrate to a new ecosystem are the same as those that choose to expand their ecosystem—to achieve incremental growth.

The Virtuals Protocol has expanded to Solana, gaining a broader user base and liquidity pool. The fact that Aave has not moved to Solana likely also involves considerations about the competitive landscape. Solana's current DeFi sector has become more mature, with multiple post-team projects competing in the lending protocol space, such as Kamino, marginfi, and Save. Therefore, the cost of Aave's expansion would be higher than anticipated.

More importantly, Aave's existing brand image will also face uncertainties due to the expansion. As some in the community have expressed, "If a fund in the seven to eight-digit range wishes to earn above-chain returns while ensuring security, nine out of ten times, they would recommend going to Aave on Ethereum rather than DeFi on Solana, Tron, Celestia, or any other chain."

Security is the foundation of a lending product. Only when there is an adequate security audit, experience in handling hack attempts, and a mature contract design will both large fund holders and regular users choose to park their assets there. Therefore, Aave's ability to become one of the most influential lending platforms on Ethereum is inseparable from Ethereum's long-standing developer ecosystem, security audit cases, and a huge, mature liquidity pool.

The financial nature of DeFi determines that "the longer it runs, the stickier it becomes." This stickiness is rooted in a deep trust in the security and stability of the product's smart contract. This "trust cost" extends beyond considerations of the speed, performance, and transaction fees of a new chain and includes the completeness of the infrastructure, the coverage of auditing companies, the community's alertness to potential security vulnerabilities, and the ecosystem's responsiveness to timely remedies under extreme conditions.

Further reading: "Rethinking DeFi: The Present and Future of Web3 Business Models"

Reflecting on Ethereum DeFi's development over the past few years, many projects have experienced significant vulnerabilities or security incidents, even suffering losses of hundreds of millions of dollars. It is through each response and iteration that the security rampart of Ethereum DeFi has gradually been built. Aave's popularity stems from leveraging this security moat, making it the preferred choice for high-volume users, especially institutional players. In other words, most people see Aave as synonymous with "low risk, decent returns," particularly for users with multi-million or even multi-tens-of-millions of dollars, where security and stability always come before incremental gains.

In contrast, Solana, as a high-performance Layer1 blockchain, does have certain advantages in transaction speed, gas fees, and other aspects. However, from the perspective of a lending protocol, the core of financial applications lies in the "risk-reward ratio." While speed and low fees are important, if a platform cannot provide sufficiently proven security and a tamper-resistant record, such advantages often may not be enough to support a long-term migration of significant liquidity in the DeFi space. Especially in lending businesses, they have to deal with multiple risk factors such as liquidation, interest rate fluctuations, smart contract audits, and hacking attacks; once issues arise, the platform's years of accumulated brand image and trust will be instantly shattered, and this "trust cost" is far more expensive than the technology itself.

Furthermore, even if Aave does choose to expand to Solana, it does not necessarily guarantee a "skyrocketing" Total Value Locked (TVL). Funds are profit-driven and rational; the two to three hundred billion dollars TVL accumulated by Aave on the Ethereum mainnet is not automatically willing to migrate to another chain. On the contrary, due to significant differences in underlying technology stacks, programming languages, and even community cultures among different chains, Aave needs to invest a significant amount of time and resources to adapt and audit, implying extremely high expansion costs and management risks. Moreover, the existing native lending protocols on Solana are also maturing, and Aave does not possess an insurmountable first-mover advantage.

Therefore, with the premise of having a triple moat of security barriers, brand, and fund scale, if Aave insists on expanding massively to Solana, it may not be the wisest choice. After all, in the long marathon race of DeFi, winning users' trust and security awareness is the most unshakable core barrier.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more