Token VS Equity: The Aave Controversy
On December 17, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth posted on social media that after four years, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had completed its investigation into the Aave protocol.
This was supposed to be an inspiring milestone. However, as Web2 finished its entanglement with the SEC, Aave found itself facing a "backyard fire" in Web3 instead. Over the past half month, Aave's community governance dispute has been a hot topic in the English-speaking community. Around this dispute, there have been a series of events including whale sells, founder "buybacks," governance, and trust issues.
Let's take a look at the background of this event.
Cause: Revenue Distribution Sparks Controversy
On December 4, Aave Labs switched the default Swap feature on its front-end interface aave.com from ParaSwap to CoWSwap.
What was originally just a minor update, Aave DAO's senior governance participant and independent delegate EzR3aL discovered that the fee revenue generated by aave.com's default Swap feature was no longer flowing into the Aave DAO treasury as before but rather into an address controlled by Aave Labs. Based on on-chain investigation, EzR3aL stated that at the time of his post, the recent income transfer by Aave Labs was worth at least $200,000, with a rough estimate of at least $10 million in annual loss for Aave DAO based on the weekly revenue data.
However, Aave Labs did not proactively mention the change in fee revenue distribution, leaving many $AAVE holders feeling "betrayed."
Aave Labs responded multiple times to EzR3aL's post, with the main arguments being:
The protocol and the product are different concepts. The frontend interface that sparked the revenue distribution dispute is a product operated by Aave Labs, completely separate from the protocol managed by Aave DAO, and Aave Labs have the right to decide how to operate and profit.
Maintaining the frontend interface requires significant resources, and Aave DAO was never required to bear these costs.
In the original Paraswap-integrated technical architecture, the donation mechanism was based on surplus. When the actual execution price was higher than the quoted price, the surplus would be donated to Aave DAO. This was not a protocol fee, nor was it a mandatory requirement to give to Aave DAO. With the design changes, the original donation mechanism was naturally discontinued.
The new CoWSwap routing option can improve execution quality, including providing MEV protection for interface users, and this routing option was concocted by Aave Labs with its own resources, and it does not replace or disable the adapters owned by the Aave DAO at the protocol level, allowing the Aave DAO to let any interface integrate its owned adapters to enable swap functionality.
Contention Upgrade: Who Owns "Aave"?
Aave Labs' response to EzR3aL's post has not been understood and accepted by the community.
On December 13, @DefiIgnas published a lengthy article titled "Who Owns Aave: Aave Labs or Aave DAO?," which sparked widespread discussion.
On December 16, former Aave Labs CTO Ernesto released a governance proposal titled "$AAVE Alignment Phase 1: Ownership," advocating for Aave DAO and Aave token holders to explicitly control core rights such as protocol IP, brand, equity, and revenue. Aave service providers representative Marc Zeller and others publicly endorsed the proposal, calling it "one of the most influential proposals in Aave's governance history."
In the proposal, Ernesto mentioned, "Due to some events in the past, some previous posts and comments have shown strong animosity towards Aave Labs. However, this proposal aims to remain neutral. The proposal does not imply that Aave Labs should not contribute to the DAO or lacks the legitimacy or ability to contribute, but the decision should be made by Aave DAO."
On December 18, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth replied to the proposal, stating that they would strengthen communication between Aave Labs and the community but would vote against the proposal because it simplifies a complex legal and operational issue into a simple "yes or no" vote without a practical solution, affecting Aave's overall development progress.
This further escalated the dispute.
Whale Sell-off, Founder's Market "Rescue"
On December 22, according to on-chain analyst yujianguo's monitoring, the whale address holding the second-largest amount of AAVE sold off 230,000 AAVE tokens (approximately $38 million), causing a short-term price drop of over 10%. The whale exchanged all AAVE for 227.8 WBTC and 5869.4 stETH between 5:40 and 7:05 a.m., reportedly acquiring these AAVE from late last year to early this year at an average cost of about $223.4. This selloff at an average price of around $165 is estimated to incur a loss of $13.45 million.
Shortly after the Whale's exit, Aave Labs announced that the issue needed formal governance decision-making and officially initiated a 3-day snapshot vote.
On December 23, Aave founder and CEO Stani.eth spent 1699 ETH (5.15 million USD) to buy 32,660 AAVE tokens at an average price of 157.78 USD. Including this purchase, he bought a total of 84,033 AAVE tokens within a week at an average price of around 176 USD, spending approximately 14.8 million USD.
However, despite the founder's "market rescue," the price turmoil continued. On December 24, the address starting with "0x3c7," known for "Large AAVE Short," opened a 7x leveraged AAVE short position with a 2.42 million USD position size at an average price of 151 USD and a liquidation price of 173 USD.
There were many doubts and concerns in the market regarding the founder's "market rescue" as well. DeFi strategist and liquidity expert Robert Mullins stated in a post that the purpose of this purchase was to increase Kulechov's voting power to support a proposal in an upcoming vote that directly harms the best interests of the token holders. He added: "This is a clear example that the token mechanism has not been adequately designed to effectively deter governance attacks."
Renowned crypto KOL Sisyphus also expressed similar concerns, suggesting that Kulechov may have sold millions of dollars worth of AAVE tokens between 2021 and 2025 and questioned the economic motives behind this buyback.
Outcome
On December 26, Wintermute's founder and CEO Evgeny Gaevoy stated that Wintermute would vote against the ARFC governance proposal to transfer the "brand asset control of AAVE to the holders."
Evgeny mentioned that the current proposal lacks specific details, and it is not clear how the entity owning the front end and brand would govern, whether it is for-profit, and how it operates. Token value capture is a core issue facing AAVE, and there is a clear mismatch in expectations between Aave Labs and a large number of token holders. Wintermute has been investing in AAVE since 2022 and has participated in its governance. Evgeny hopes that Aave Labs will address the issue of token value capture seriously, which will serve as a reference for other tokens.
The voting results were also released this morning, with the proposal ultimately not passing, resulting in 55.29% against, 41.21% abstaining, and only 3.5% in favor.

So, is this the end of the dispute? Apparently not, as the lack of trust between the community and Aave Labs remains unresolved. What seemed to be a conflict triggered by poor communication is actually a manifestation of the long-standing contradiction in the crypto world between development/operation teams and governance, where rights and interests are unclear and lack institutional constraints. The entanglement between Aave Labs and Aave DAO actually underscores Aave's success, as there are too many similar examples in the crypto world where such high-quality discussions do not even have the opportunity to occur in an attempt to resolve issues (related reading: Why are projects in the crypto space not asking for tokens in acquisitions?).
This is the problem Aave must face, and it is a problem that the entire cryptocurrency industry will sooner or later have to confront.
You may also like

Kyle Samani's Exit Scam, Is There More to the Story?

February 10th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Tokenomics New Paradigm? When Backpack Starts Enabling VCs to "Deferred Gratification"

BankrCoin Achieves New Milestones as YZi Labs and ETH Investors Make Significant Moves
Key Takeaways BankrCoin (BNKR) hit a new all-time high with significant market activity. YZi Labs executed a major…

Bitcoin Tests $75K Amid Market Predictions
Key Takeaways Bitcoin shows a 47% chance to test the $75,000 mark this February, contrasting with a potential…

MrBeast Acquires Step to Enhance Financial Offerings for Youth
Key Takeaways YouTube star MrBeast has acquired the financial services platform Step through Beast Industries. The acquisition aims…

Polymarket Predicts Bitcoin Uptrend as MrBeast Ventures into Fintech
Key Takeaways Bitcoin’s Potential Surge: Polymarket denotes a fluctuating probability of Bitcoin achieving $75,000 in February, reflecting volatile…

MrBeast Enters Financial Services with Step Acquisition
Key Takeaways Binance announced an Alpha Airdrop event, highlighting the growing trend of gamified airdrops. Bitcoin prediction markets…

Analysts Predict Bitcoin May Fall to $55K as Support Levels Threaten
Key Takeaways Analysts suggest a potential drop of Bitcoin to $55K if current support levels are breached. Galaxy…

Analysts Predict Bitcoin May Drop to $55K Amid Support Challenges
Key Takeaways Experts caution that Bitcoin could fall to $55,000 if current support levels are breached. The market…

Bitcoin May Decline to $55K: Analysts Warn
Key Takeaways Analysts project Bitcoin could drop to $55,000 if key support levels fail. Technical analysts forecast that…

YZI Labs Transfers Massive ID Tokens to Binance as BNKR Hits New High
Key Takeaways BNKR, a digital currency, has achieved its highest-priced milestone of $0.295 CAD as of January 26,…

MrBeast Acquires Step, Expanding Influence in Teen Finance Market
Key Takeaways MrBeast has acquired the financial services app Step, which caters specifically to Gen Z users. Step…

Analysts Predict Bitcoin’s Critical Support Level May Trigger Decline
Key Takeaways Experts indicate a crucial moment for Bitcoin, with potential price drop to $55,000 if support fails.…

Michael Saylor Faces Bitcoin Valuation Challenges: Impact on the Crypto Market
Key Takeaways Michael Saylor’s Bitcoin investment is currently valued at $55 billion, but recent market trends have seen…

MrBeast Acquires Step FinTech App in Strategic Move
Key Takeaways MrBeast’s company, Beast Industries, has announced the acquisition of Step, a fintech app focused on Gen…

Bitcoin’s Potential Surge Sparks Debate Among Investors
Key Takeaways The probability that Bitcoin will reach $75,000 in February fluctuates as predicted by Polymarket. Bitcoin recently…

Analysts Predict Bitcoin’s Potential Plunge to $55K
Key Takeaways Analysts warn of a possible drop to $55K if Bitcoin’s current support breaks. 10X Research and…
Kyle Samani's Exit Scam, Is There More to the Story?
February 10th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
Tokenomics New Paradigm? When Backpack Starts Enabling VCs to "Deferred Gratification"
BankrCoin Achieves New Milestones as YZi Labs and ETH Investors Make Significant Moves
Key Takeaways BankrCoin (BNKR) hit a new all-time high with significant market activity. YZi Labs executed a major…
Bitcoin Tests $75K Amid Market Predictions
Key Takeaways Bitcoin shows a 47% chance to test the $75,000 mark this February, contrasting with a potential…
MrBeast Acquires Step to Enhance Financial Offerings for Youth
Key Takeaways YouTube star MrBeast has acquired the financial services platform Step through Beast Industries. The acquisition aims…