Why crypto games shouldn’t monetize too early

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/16 02:45:04
0
Share
copy
This is a segment from The Drop newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. Blockchain gaming has gone through various cycles of sentiment. These cycles include 2017, with CryptoKitties, and 2018, with games like Axie Infinity, Gods Unchained and Splinterlands. While some might think crypto gaming is in decline these days, venture capital firm Bitkraft Ventures doesn’t see it that way. “Not only is it not dead, but its future is as bright as almost any category,” Matt Halstead, a new partner at Bitkraft, told me in an interview. The firm counts AMGI, Immutable, HyperPlay and Yield Guild Games among their 100+ portfolio companies, plus non-crypto firms like Discord and Epic Games. Bitkraft obviously stands to benefit from crypto gaming’s success, but they’re also investing in what they believe the future will look like. “One bet that I would be, you know, very happy to make is that gaming will not only exist, but it will be multiples bigger than it is today. And I just don’t think you can look at the world and have that level of conviction in too many themes. And so I think to ignore gaming will be proven to be a big mistake,” Halstead added. After the play-to-earn run subsided in early 2022 — when tokens like Axie Infinity’s AXS token fell roughly 91% in less than six months — some upstart crypto game studios touted a “play- and -earn” narrative. A number of crypto games studios told me around that time that the industry needed to get away from the farming-focused financialized games, arguing that their games would put gameplay before their economies to “make a good game first.” Around that time, some game studios and investors held the view that in-game items would become interoperable, and that NFTs would be part of that vision. But crypto gaming’s once-touted vision of interoperable in-game items as assets on the blockchain hasn’t quite panned out — especially when hype around the metaverse faded in 2023. Halstead suggested the prevailing sentiment toward crypto gaming is something that’s a problem across crypto: There’s a very short feedback loop where expectations don’t always meet reality. “I just think there’s a fundamental lack of understanding of games in general,” he added. So how could crypto organically fit into games, and where will we see future success? Halstead sees the creator economy, cosmetic items, and the social element of gaming as areas that could do well with blockchain integrations going forward. But there’s also the obvious, continued fit of more financial-forward games, or “GameFi” titles, wherein a betting element or gambling element is offered with an entertainment layer on top. Bitkraft General Partner Carlos Pereira predicts that this year, we’ll see a solid AI-native crypto game release. But “risk-to-earn” is also a big subgenre. Loot Labs is one of Bitkraft’s most successful portfolio companies right now, Pereira told me. Loot Labs offers buyers mystery assets as NFT loot boxes, whereby you spin a wheel and don’t know what you’re going to get. “And so as long as you acknowledge that there’s this concept of risk-to-earn,” Pereira said, “that’s totally okay. And we’ve had these games for a long time, and there’s fit with crypto. [And] there’s still the space for all the other types of games.” Bitkraft advises all their portfolio game studios against selling NFTs or launching a token before the game releases because that approach sets high expectations — and puts studios in a bind if they fail to meet those expectations by backing out or adjusting earlier plans. “We certainly believe that on average, the right decision is not trying to monetize your community too early [...] and that’s not what the average games have done,” Pereira said. “Of course, we have had things that fail. Of course, we’re in the business of making mistakes, and then hopefully when we don’t make a mistake, it’s a really good thing. But you haven’t seen us attached to the games that raised a bunch of money on a launchpad, or the games that sold $40 million in NFTs.” Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/crypto-games-shouldnt-monetize-early-nfts

You may also like

Deconstructing the Public Chain Pharos Capital Game: Is a $950 million valuation supported by assets like photovoltaics just a shell transaction under layers of betting?

When a physical industry company injects physical assets into a Layer 1 project, it can easily create a valuation of 950 million dollars by calculating several times the value of the physical assets. Is this kind of capital game too outrageous? Does the crypto market really need such RWAs?

a16z: AI is making everyone 10x more productive, but the true winner has yet to emerge

Institutional AI and Retail AI "Better Integration" is an Inevitable Trend.

Why did the star Web3 project Across Protocol choose to abandon DAO?

The proposal for Across to privatize itself is a rare move, but it comes at a time when the industry is beginning to recognize that DAOs are a difficult organizational structure to operate.

In fact, ETH scaling is a major benefit for L2

ETH has finally admitted defeat—its Rollup-centric roadmap is unworkable, while the monolithic scaling solutions adopted by blockchains like Solana have proven to be correct.

Memories: 10 Key Contributions of the TON Core Team That Few People Knew in the Early Days

Every line of code, every tool we build, every sleepless night spent maintaining the network—these efforts have laid the foundation for TON's development today.

2025 South Korea CEX Listing Post-Mortem: Investing in New Coins = 70% Loss?

The 2025 South Korean exchange's new token listing performance is structurally similar to Binance's, with no significant differences.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more